View previous topic :: View next topic |
Do u think Apocalypse spell was good or bad for REX? |
Good |
|
38% |
[ 12 ] |
Bad |
|
61% |
[ 19 ] |
|
Total Votes : 31 |
|
Author |
Message |
anubis Disciple
Joined: 27 Sep 2006 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:36 am Post subject: No Apocalypse Spell-Disagree (Labiri Please Read and Answer) |
|
|
The world is fast!
Nobody have time to keep playing for hours to get 1 simple lvl up.
I just want to make my statement in this post that Apocalypse spell did help me a lot with its staff.
Even with it was hard to lvl up!
Now think about one thing: My buddies are all lvl 45, 48, even 50... They are all this because of what? Apocalypse staff.
The Apoca staff is unfair? Maybe it is.
But MORE unfair is the fact that im only lvl 34 and im weak! I just dont have my apoca staff anymore...
So if i downloaded REX one week earlier, i would be lvl 45, 46...would be happy and apoca staff wouldnt be necessary for me.
So, again, i think REmoving Apoca Staff is only bad for noobs like my character. The strong guys keep strong and the weak MORE weak!
Think about this Labiri... _________________ .: Fundador Immortals :. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Endurio Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Posts: 136
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:47 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Why don't you get to their lvl without apoca staff? You can then laugh in their faces about getting up by yourself, not with the help of some lame apoca staff? Make this to your advantage and just have fun with the game. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Model Dungeon Explorer
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 112
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:30 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
i made 49 without apo o_O
stop wining 41-42 is no problem to make and u got flamedart if u can't do it your own, nab;/ _________________ www.purepwnage.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LABiRi Master Of The Rebirth
Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 786 Location: Roma
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:12 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
I totally quote Endurio and Model. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Moon Dungeon Explorer
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 174 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:13 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
apoc is lame. you can also play with lower lvl chars, char lvl isnt the most important thing. u need skill! i know its hard to exp but NOONE forces you to... if u want to get high lvl char and you have fun on playing, its no prob for you to exp with apoc, like every rog/warri normally do... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HeNtai Dungeon Explorer
Joined: 15 Apr 2006 Posts: 51 Location: P(r)0land
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thanatos[IE] Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:45 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Moon wrote: | apoc is lame. you can also play with lower lvl chars, char lvl isnt the most important thing. u need skill! i know its hard to exp but NOONE forces you to... if u want to get high lvl char and you have fun on playing, its no prob for you to exp with apoc, like every rog/warri normally do... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Moon Dungeon Explorer
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 174 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:47 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
to make apoc book with lvl req (if it would but be possible) isnt good idea because the high lvl chars can exp the other chars i think its good that apoc is gone! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gogan Disciple
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 37 Location: Białystok
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:21 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
it's very good that it's gone
That guy from the first post just told us that he was using a bug. Ban for him?
"I'm so weak, i can't lvlup without it ;(" - omfg so noobish o_O |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Galbraith Disciple
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 5:09 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
i voted to have apo back, but not to exp or kill other players, just becouse i like that spell
btw 49 lev requiment wont be so easy to implement with certain spell book IMO, but idea is great.
i propose to nerf that spell too.
I just like how it work, not how it kills in so easy way, and how it helped someone to level up without eforts.
in concern like unfairness in PvP, better will be make this spell unable to attack in PvP, like it was in classic, now it is Fire based and its purpose is different than killing only triple immunes.
Maybe change this like it was in classic?
so:
- nerf it
- prevent using in PvP
or
add some other nice spell i just dont like empty spaces in Wizards book
just finished downloading new version and going to play
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Moon Dungeon Explorer
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 174 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 5:36 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
you cannot hit someone with apoc, but theres a bug that u get hitted if u stand next to a monster which get hitted by apoc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dithrim Disciple
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 48 Location: Poland.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 5:43 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Galbraith wrote: |
so:
- nerf it
- prevent using in PvP
or
add some other nice spell i just dont like empty spaces in Wizards book
just finished downloading new version and going to play
|
Grrr, if it would be that easy to prevent it in using it in PK/PvP, that would be done, don't u think?
LOL 'add some other nice spell' I don't think it would be easy too... but u can help if u can do that for sure, dude. _________________ Per Aspera Ad Astra. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Galbraith Disciple
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:48 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Dith u noob, ofc it easy -> look how it work in classic
best regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MarmoR Disciple
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:02 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
bad bad bad |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dithrim Disciple
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 48 Location: Poland.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:06 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Gal if ur so smart and pr0 - do that dude, don't shout 'HEY HEY HEY GIVE APOC BACK OR NEW SPELLS PLX CAUSE I WANT THAT C'MON C'MON'. And do it balanced, not to harm game mechanics. _________________ Per Aspera Ad Astra. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|